Lolida 2000
Lolida 2000
NR | 03 February 1998 (USA)
Lolida 2000 Trailers

Sex is banned but Lolita becomes a sexual rebel and broadcasts erotic adventures throughout the universe while satisfying her own forbidden fantasies.

Reviews
Incannerax

What a waste of my time!!!

... View More
Ploydsge

just watch it!

... View More
Supelice

Dreadfully Boring

... View More
Celia

A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

... View More
nobby_goat

It's been on Sci Fi channel (Sky) recently.It's gone a lot further than anything else on Sky recently - open leg & clear back shots.What's not to like?Oh I have to fill 10 lines.... well there's at least one scene taken out of another film, I enjoyed a pizza while I was watching it, it wasn't Ingloreous Basteurds (which I watched tonight and was terrible). Err... Come on Blackpool!Oh god, losing the will to live - look it's a standard soft core film with a little sneaky peek at a few flaps now and then. That's it!

... View More
barnthebarn

Cybil Richards directs another Full Moon/Surrender Cinema masterpiece of erotica. This time Jacqualine Lovell (dressed in rather fetching silver outfit) is tasked with destroying all evidence of sexual activity. However she can't resist watching the tapes and she kinda likes them. The sex scenes are well filmed and set to a superb soundtrack (at least for this sort of film). The cast are largely awful and mainly very average looking too. Jacqueline Lovell is her exceptionally attractive self and between viewing the sex files she manages to expose her chest and fumble a little down below. She also fits in a little lesbian activity. To be honest Lovell deserves so much better than this kind of fare. Here she looks great naked but actually is much more appealing in her silver attire narrating the 'drama'. Utterly rubbish movie with Lovell and soundtrack the only real redeeming features. Mediocre even for Surrender's output and clearly a new budget low for them also.

... View More
Theo Robertson

Thankfully the only dodgy thing about LOLITA 2000 is the title . Come to think of it it`s a really stupid title for a soft core porn movie which may turn off a potential audience , but take it from me that the cast are well above the age of consent . I should know because watched this movie over and over again , made a note of the cast members names , typed them into an internet search engine to find out their dates of births and I can confirm it`s all above board . We`re not talking Traci Lords here As you`d expect in these type of movies there`s a very basic premise that`s just an excuse to show some soft core sex , but LOLITA 2000 is better than most simply because the cast look like they might actually be having sex , and boy are the actresses fit with special mention going to Gabriella Hall If I have any complaints it`s to do with the sound cutting out during the sex scenes to be replaced by muzak which is my main gripe about all these soft core movies . But I musn`t grumble too much because the cast are hot which is not something I can say about many hard core movies

... View More
David Brown

Lolita 2000 ranks up there with Virtual Encounters 1, Virtual Encounters 2, and Femalien as one of the "must have" softcore videos that Surrender Cinema released in the last half of the 1990's.This is what softcore is supposed to be. The women are beautiful, the sex scenes are plentiful, and the action stops just short of actual hardcore. My favorites scenes were the prison cell lesbians and the totally gratuitous encounter between the 1950's lovers in the diner.This is an easy recommendation.

... View More