What makes it different from others?

Am I Missing Something?

This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.

The film's masterful storytelling did its job. The message was clear. No need to overdo.

The visuals and plot parallels are brilliant. Perhaps it was seeing the first in a theater when people didn't have interrupting smart phone sounds or felt the need to comment for everyone to hear two or three seats ahead or back.Please filter out anyone any comment that uses "women are hot" or do not cite Rutger Hauer.Adult version. "Blade Runner" was a step away from Harrison Ford's typecast. A dark role, but anyone that payed attention to 2049 could not miss the flawless re- performance. Well casted with Ryan Gosling and Edward James.

Is a long movie and for long periods of time nothing is going on. every moves slowly. Ana de Armas is gorgeous. That wake me up. I think the movie was a build up for the moment when Harrison Ford shows up.

I love it when i have high expectations for a film and it totally delivers. It feels super satisfying. I kinda didn't want it to end. This thing is a great piece of art. Everything about its visuals is perfect and it sounds spectacular. It has as great a story as you can get in a sci-fi film. Casting choices are super on point. There were some very captivating scenes that took my breath away.This is the sequal to the 1982's Blade Runner. We follow a Blade Runner named K on his quest to find answers about a miracle baby.

Of Zhora's crackling glass? The Poetry of 'like tears in rain?' The charm of 'Good evening, J.F!' The fury of Pris's gymnastics? The NOIR of Deckard's voiceover? How is this ugly beigeness even entertainment?And not only is it NOT entertainment, it is a crime against the power of its progenitor. It is a weak wannabe that is not . . . NOT 'Blade Runner.'